3

In We Have Always Lived in the Castle, the poisoning is committed using arsenic (this is common knowledge in the narrative of the book, and is not a spoiler past the first few chapters, at the least). Arsenic, as a heavy metal poisoning, tends to take a longer period of poisoning as it has to build up in the body, while the poisoned characters in the story have an immediate and fatal reaction to eating the poison (which would only really be possible if one ignores that arsenic at that dosage level would be extremely noticeable to the taste). Leaving aside the possibility of error, the TV Tropes page states that "the original poison was strychnine, which really would produce the rapid, dramatic death portrayed in the story, and which was in turn a nod to one of Jackson's favorite murderers, Jane Toppan, who poisoned her patients this way". Is this something that is seen in recorded early drafts, or correspondence by the author? I have seen some references to that early drafts of the story (where Constance and Merricat were not sisters, and had different names) exist on record.

I will be content with an answer that shows that the known early drafts did not involve strychnine and/or that known correspondence does not support it.

4
  • 2
    FYI, I messaged the TVTropes user who added that section. They have no memory of where they got their information.
    – MJ713
    Commented Sep 20 at 16:35
  • 1
    Perhaps somebody said something to the effect that Shirley Jackson should have used strychnine, as that poison actually has the effects described in the novel. And then this got misremembered and included in the TV Tropes page. I don't see why Shirley Jackson would have any reason to change the poison from one that matches the effects described to one that doesn't.
    – Peter Shor
    Commented Nov 7 at 16:00
  • 1
    @PeterShor: True, although I could also see something like how MacGuyver always was missing a thing or two in anything explosive so as to prevent impressionable youths from making thermite or poisoning their family without first at least doing a little research. Commented Nov 7 at 20:44
  • 1
    Are there any SE denizens who live in Washington DC? Jackson's papers are stored at the Library of Congress, but unfortunately they are not digitized - you have to go there in person. Commented Nov 8 at 7:52

1 Answer 1

5
+50

If early drafts of We Have Always Lived in the Castle survive, they are doubtless with Jackson's papers at the Library of Congress in Washington DC. In their absence, however, we can seek some answers in Ruth Franklin's biography of Jackson, Shirley Jackson: A Rather Haunted Life1.

Franklin relates that much of the original draft of Castle was "lost or destroyed", but that some of the original plot can be pieced together from the letters that Jackson sent to her close friend, Jeanne Beatty, while in the throes of composition. Checking The Letters of Shirley Jackson2 reveals that initially (March 1960) Jackson originally considered using mushrooms as the source of poison:

my big problem now is how to kill him; after reading ten million mystery stories i still don’t know a good way. i want something highly suspicious but possibly natural, like mushrooms but i don’t really know one end of a mushroom from another. some highly poisonous garden plant (not oleanders i just happened to find that by chance in the children’s encyclopedia) but i read somewhere larkspur.

So although not thinking of strychnine specifically, she was considering poisons derived from plants. Later that year (September) she went on to amplify her remark about larkspur:

larkspur was used, by the way, in a lovely old english mystery whose name i cannot remember. i never had much faith in mushrooms.

This final comment about mushrooms seems to indicate that she was changing her mind, although she did borrow a field guide to mushrooms from her friend Libbie Burke, and:

made careful notes on the poisonous ones: Amanita pantherina, false blusher (“highly poisonous”); Amanita muscaria, fly agaric (“highly poisonous”); Amanita phalloides, death cap (“deadly poisonous”).

Franklin writes that the final form of the murder was actually inspired by the Bravo case:

a famous case that took place in Victorian England, in which a man named Charles Bravo died mysteriously of antimony poisoning. His wife, Florence, was significantly wealthier and insisted on keeping her money in her name; he may, in fact, have accidentally swallowed poison that he intended for her. The couple’s maid might also have been involved. (The case was never solved.)

Arsenic and antimony have quite similar chemical properties, and so this does seem a likely inspiration for form of murder she eventually chose, although I do not see a reference to it in her published letters.

So it seems that Jackson did indeed consider other forms of poison before settling on arsenic. The sources I have available to me, however, make no mention of strychnine, or indeed Jane Toppan. Possibly this information is in Jackson's unpublished papers, or maybe some information garbling has occurred.


  1. Shirley Jackson: A Rather Haunted Life, Ruth Franklin (2016).

  2. The Letters of Shirley Jackson, Shirley Jackson, Laurence Jackson Hyman (Editor), Bernice M. Murphy (Contributor), (2021).

1
  • Yours is the forerunner for the correct answer. Commented Nov 8 at 14:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.