4

As I understand it, the scholarship has so far not compellingly answered a significant question of the text of Romeo and Juliet; namely, why the Capulets and the Montagues are at war.

I am convinced based on my understanding of Shakespeare's poetics that an unmistakably correct answer is supplied in the text, however cleverly and discreetly.

Please provide the closest hypotheses of which you are aware - your own or scholars' - to that "unmistakably correct answer."

  • 4
    I don't see any reason why Shakespeare would have needed or wanted to give the cause of the feud. Feuds weren't unusual. One of the messages of the play is that feuds are senseless. If Shakespeare had implied that the feud originally had a valid cause, he would be undercutting this message. – Peter Shor Dec 20 '18 at 9:37
  • There is an interesting paper "The Origins of the Legend of Romeo and Juliet in Italy" by Olin H. Moore, published in Speculum, Vol. 5, No. 3 (Jul., 1930), pp. 264-277; ( jstor.org/stable/2848744 ). Bottom line summary: there was no feud, it's just a story. – kimchi lover Dec 20 '18 at 19:19
  • See also O. H. Moore's 1950 book, The Legend of Romeo and Juliet, ohiostatepress.org/books/Complete%20PDFs/Moore%20Legend/… which is less terse than his 1930 article. – kimchi lover Dec 20 '18 at 19:58
  • 1
    What is the reasoning that convinced you that the question is significant and has an answer? What's wrong with the idea that the history of the feud is just not part of the story? – user14111 Dec 20 '18 at 21:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.