2

I know that the monster is addressed as Frankenstein in several spin off movies, but after doing some primary research cant find where this idea came from. Thanks in advance!

5

Actually, it started very early on and probably wasn't inspired by anything in particular. Probably it was created of either laziness ("Frankenstein's monster" is so long) or ignorance ("Dracula" is both the name of the book and the monster).

As I wrote elsewhere, using "Frankenstein" to refer to Frankenstein’s monster dates back to at least 1838, only 20 years after the book was published according to the OED:

They [sc. mules] really seem like Frankensteins of the animal creation.
Murray's Handbook Sicily

Here's another example I found from only a year later, in 1839:

Two gigantic empires—the Frankensteins of our own creation, which will soon turn upon the author of their being—are shooting...
The London Quarterly Review

| improve this answer | |
2

It seems really unlikely that there's any single path, and the monster is "a Frankenstein" in at least some of the same ways that a Model T. is "a Ford" or Guernica is "a Picasso." But James Whale is also obviously a key tributary of the drifting reference.

  • James Whale's 1931 movie with Boris Karloff (the seminal visual depiction of the monster) totally centers the monster in a movie called "Frankenstein." Moreover, many (if not all) of the posters for the film have the text "Frankenstein" superimposed on Karloff's giant forehead.

  • James Whale made a 1935 movie that not only compounds, but trades on the ambiguious reference, being called "The Bride of Frankenstein." The bride is of course a bride for the Monster, conceived by the mad scientist Frankenstein (though not the same Frankenstein as made the first monster!)

| improve this answer | |
0

The popular recognition of Victor Frankenstein's Creature as simply "Frankenstein" started with the films; since more people were familiar with the films, popular culture began to acknowledge the movie portrayal of the Creature more than the literary portrayal.

https://www.futurity.org/frankensteins-monster-comics-movies-1589812/

From the above link you can see how the Creature has progressed through film; this progression seems to suggest my conjecture.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    Have you got any references for that? – Gallifreyan Nov 24 '19 at 7:34
-2

Sloppy reading and people only hearing part of the name and probably movies , Frankenstein's monster comes across as Frankenstein is the monster. I haven't seen any of the movies but if the Monster is called Frankenstein in them, that would be the source. Very few people have read the book but thousands have seen the movies. Why movie producers make the changes they do is not a field subject to study.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    "I haven't seen any of the movies but if the Monster is called Frankenstein in them, that would be the source." And if it isn't? This answer has a lot of "if" and "probably". – Rand al'Thor Nov 21 '19 at 18:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.