3

From Chapter 4 of Biographia Literaria by Samuel Taylor Coleridge:

I am indeed convinced in my own mind, that could the same experiment have been tried with these volumes, as was made in the well known story of the picture, the result would have been the same; the parts which had been covered by black spots on the one day, would be found equally albo lapide notatae on the succeeding.

What does Coleridge mean by “the well known story of the picture”?

2

The publication date of the Biographia (1817) made me wonder if this was anything to do with early photography.

It turns out that Thomas Wedgwood was carrying out early experiments with sensitised leather and paper, creating what were then known as 'shadow pictures'. His friend Humphry Davy wrote and published in 1802, in the Journal of the Royal Institution, a paper entitled “An Account of a Method of Copying Paintings upon Glass, and of Making Profiles, by the Agency of Light upon Nitrate of Silver, with observations by Humphrey Davy. Invented by T. Wedgwood, Esq.”

So it seemed possible that Coleridge's reference was to photographic process, but the likelihood of this is increased by the fact that Wedgwood was Coleridge's friend and Patron.

Source: Wikipedia Thomas Wedgwood (Photographer)

2

We can reconstruct, I think, what the story must have been, from Coleridge’s brief précis of it. Perhaps it was something like this:

A painter was present at an exhibition of his works and overheard a spectator say, “This picture has too many black spots.” The painter was mortified and worked all night to correct the picture, but on the next day the same spectator returned and said, “This picture has too many white spots.”*

* albo lapidae notatae = marked by a white stone

That is, the spectator was motivated by a desire to criticize, not by any particular flaw in the work. This corresponds to Coleridge’s analysis of the motives behind the criticism of the Lake Poets, which he sees as deriving from

an unquiet state of mind, which seeks alleviation by quarrelling with the occasion of it

provoked by Wordsworth’s argumentative preface to Lyrical Ballads, and not by any particular detail of the poems:

the same general censure has been grounded by almost every different person on some different poem

As to the origin of the story, I have been unable to trace it. But it is similar in outline to an anecdote in Pliny about the painter Apelles of Kos:

Another habit of his was when he had finished his works to place them in a gallery in the view of passers by, and he himself stood out of sight behind the picture and listened to hear what faults were noticed, rating the public as a more observant critic than himself. And it is said that he was found fault with by a shoemaker because in drawing a subject’s sandals he had represented the loops in them as one too few, and the next day the same critic was so proud of the artist’s correcting the fault indicated by his previous objection that he found fault with the leg, but Apelles indignantly looked out from behind the picture and rebuked him, saying that a shoemaker in his criticism must not go beyond the sandal—a remark that has also passed into a proverb.

Pliny the Elder, Natural History, book XXXV, translated by David Edward Eichholz.

There is another mention of the story in Newman’s Tracts for the Times, though this postdates Biographia Literaria:

But once begin altering, and there will be no reason or justice in stopping, till the criticisms of all parties are satisfied. Thus, will not the Liturgy be in the evil case described in the well-known story, of the picture subjected by the artist to the observations of passers-by?

John Henry Newman, ‘Thoughts respectfully addressed to the clergy on alterations in the liturgy’, 9th September 1833.

  • Plus one cos I think you might be right. – Spagirl Oct 20 '18 at 20:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.