6

From "The Female Vagrant":

But ill they suited me; those journeys dark
O'er moor and mountain, midnight theft to hatch!
To charm the surly House-dog's faithful bark,
Or hang on tip-toe at the lifted latch.
The gloomy lantern, and the dim blue match,
The black disguise, the warning whistle shrill,
And ear still busy on its nightly watch,
Were not for me, brought up in nothing ill:
Besides, on griefs so fresh my thoughts were brooding still.

What is this "dim blue match"? A match which, after being struck, glows only blue, without producing the red flame?

1
  • By the way, you can change your acceptance (switch the green tick) if you feel a new answer is better than an old accepted one.
    – Rand al'Thor
    Commented Jan 22, 2019 at 17:06

2 Answers 2

3

That would be my understanding, yes. Either because of wind the match is burning weakly or because a flame is coloured according to what is burning, so there might have been 19th century matches that were dipped in a chemical which produced blueish flame.

1
  • 1
    18th century matches ... The Female Vagrant was finished by 1800. Matches that vaguely resembled the ones we know today wouldn't be invented for another 50 years.
    – Peter Shor
    Commented Jun 19, 2018 at 2:11
3
+50

The match can’t be a friction match as these were not invented until 1826, long after the publication of ‘The Female Vagrant’ in the first edition of Lyrical Ballads, 1798. Instead, the blue flame indicates that it is a sulphur match.

Before sulphur matches, the way to light an oil lamp (if you didn’t have a fire already burning) was to use flint and steel to make sparks to ignite tinder, blow on the tinder until it burst into flame, use the burning tinder to light a wax taper or paper spill, and use the taper to light the lamp. Persuading the tinder to burn hot enough to light the taper was a delicate and time-consuming process, and sulphur matches (which caught fire at a lower temperature) sped up this step.

Even with sulphur matches, the process was tiresome:

When I was young [in the 1790s], the process of obtaining fire, in every house in England, with few exceptions, was as rude, as laborious, and as uncertain, as the effort of the Indian to produce a flame by the friction of two dry sticks.

The night-lamp and the rushlight were for the comparatively luxurious. In the bedrooms of the cottager, the artisan, and the small tradesman, the infant at its mother’s side too often awoke, like Milton’s Nightingale, ‘darkling,’ but that nocturnal note was something different from ‘harmonious numbers.’ The mother was soon on her feet; the friendly tinder-box was duly sought. Click, click, click; not a spark tells upon the sullen blackness. More rapidly does the flint ply the sympathetic steel. The room is bright with the radiant shower. But the child, familar enough with the operation, is impatient at its tediousness, and shouts till the mother is frantic. At length one lucky spark does its office—the tinder is alight. Now for the match. It will not burn. A gentle breath is wafted into the murky box; the face that leans over the tinder is in a glow. Another match, and another, and another. They are all damp. The toil-worn father ‘swears a prayer or two;’ the baby is inexorable; and the misery is only ended when the good man has gone to the street door, and after long shivering, has obtained a light from the watchman.

Charles Knight (1859). Once Upon a Time, London: John Murray, p. 501.

This process was improved by the discovery of chemical ignition in the 18th century:

[Sulphur matches] continued in use throughout the 18th century, but after about 1780 phosphorus devices in various forms began to replace them. For instance, the ‘philosophical bottles’ were small vessels containing a partially oxidised yellow phosphorus and kept tightly corked; when a light was wanted a sulphur match was pushed in, turned round and quickly drawn out, igniting on contact with the air.

Joseph Needham (1962). Science and Civilisation in China, Volume 4 Part 1: Physics, Cambridge University Press, p. 71.

These bottles probably arrived too late, or too expensively, for the characters in Wordsworth’s poem:

The first chemical light-producer was a complex and ornamental casket, sold at a guinea. In a year or so there were pretty portable cases of a phial and matches, which enthusiastic young housekeepers regarded as the cheapest of all treasures at five shillings. By-and-by the light-box was sold as low as a shilling. The fire revolution was slowly approaching.

Knight, p. 502

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.