7

Нет, конечно. Насколько я помню, мы ничего об этом Супермене и не знали тогда. Я уже писал, что Максим был нашим ответом начальству: не хотите серьезной литературы? Пожалуйста! Вот вам залипуха о приключениях комсомольца 22-го века. Почему-то нам, дуракам молодым, казалось, что мы таким образом способны специально раздражить начальство. Впрочем, начальство, действительно, впало в раздражение, но совсем по другому поводу.

Of course not. As far as I remember, we did not know anything about this Superman. I already wrote that Maxim was our response to the authorities: You do not want serious literature? Here you go! Here you have a pulp about the adventures of a 22-century Komsomol member. For some reason, it seemed to us, young fools, that in this way we were able to especially annoy our superiors. However, the superiors, indeed, were irritated, but quite for quite a different reason.

Source: Boris Strugatsky Off-Line Interview, 7/2000, Q#26, discussing why Maksim Kammerer from "Inhabited Island" was such a "superman".

What exactly was that reason that Strugatsky's "superiors" (presumably, publishing/censorship/literature board bosses) were irritated with seemingly wholly pro-Soviet "Inhabited Island"?

  • Their German trasnlator wrote about this, I'd need to check at home. ping me in few days in case I forget. – mart Apr 17 '18 at 8:44
  • @mart Ping! ;-) I hope you find some time to check what that German translator said. – Christophe Strobbe May 30 '18 at 15:43
  • @ChristopheStrobbe I borrowed the Strugatsky cube with the Inhabited Island out and don't have it in my shelf right now :( – mart May 30 '18 at 22:06
2

I don't think anybody can have a definite answer here.

My understanding is that the same Mak Sim portrayed by someone else (say Adamov of the previous generation, or Kazantzev, or even Efremov) would go unnoticed by both начальство and the audience alike. Начальство was irritated by the authors much more than by a character. Recall how popular were they, and how much non-conformant were they perceived; this is a good enough reason for irritation.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.