6

I've got a few hardcover books. I usually read paperback, but sometimes I'll find myself with a hardcover book.
Often, these will have jackets on them. Paper jackets that rip and get in the way and fall off when you try to move them. You can't even use them as proper bookmarks, they'll just slip out. (No, I love those covers, why do you ask?)

Is there any harm that it will do to the book itself if I remove the jacket and permanently keep it off?

  • The name I've heard for them is dustjackets. Presumably they're easier to wipe dust off than the cover of the book itself? – Rand al'Thor Aug 19 '17 at 22:24
  • Depending on whom you ask, the jacket is often far more prettier than the hardcover, which is usually bare, with just the title, and no illustration. You'd be harming the book's looks. – muru Aug 20 '17 at 1:30
  • 2
    If you separate the jackets from their books, you have the problem of how to store the jackets so they won't be creased or otherwise damaged, and so that you will be able to access a particular jacket when you wish to reunite it with its book. – user14111 Aug 21 '17 at 5:41
  • @user14111 That's assuming you want to keep the jackets - it sounds like the OP dislikes them enough that he might just want to throw them away if they're not necessary on the books. – Rand al'Thor Aug 21 '17 at 9:01
  • 1
    @Randal'Thor In case the OP or his heirs want to sell the books some day, it will be better to have the jackets. – user14111 Aug 21 '17 at 9:06
3

I don't believe dustjackets protect a book to a significant degree. But I am in favour of keeping them with the book.

Dustjackets are often prettier than the book.

The flaps of a dustjacket can be used as bookmarks (unless the book is very big).

The dustjacket can be removed while the book is being read and left on the bookshelf as a marker of where it goes.

This article from 2015 argues for keeping dustjackets on the books - for decoration, for keeping the actual book undamaged, and for the extra information printed on the inside flaps.

But my favourite use of dustjackets (also mentioned at the end of the above article) is for disguising the book I am actually reading.

| improve this answer | |
  • Wow. The article that your article links to is hilarious to me and I hope it's satire. I can understand if people prefer looking at the fabric covers and that we should have covers with images printed on them. But the whole "ripping / slipping" argument is ridiculous. If you're having that much trouble, just remove the jacket when reading and put it back after. – Merlin -they-them- Oct 20 at 15:04
1

The dust jacket is more delicate than the stiff covers of a hardcover book, so it does not really be around the book while you're reading it. In fact, that is a good argument for temporarily removing the book jacket while you're reading the book. As Biblio.com points out (emphasis added),

The dust jacket is both the most decorative part of a book, and the most delicate. A missing dust jacket, or a dust jacket that is in poor condition, can cut a collectible book's value more than 50%, and make it harder to find a buyer.

Similarly, Skinner Inc points out,

If there is one single thing that is a make or break for book value, it would be the dust jacket. The value of a first edition copy of F. Scott Fitzgerald’s Tender is the Night with dust jacket is around $6,000. Without a dust jacket….$300. This huge difference in value is largely due to the fact that more than 90% of dust jackets are destroyed, either deliberately or due to their ephemeral and fragile nature. If you have one on a good book, treasure it and be sure to protect it with a plastic sleeve.

(If you watch TV shows such as The Antiques Road Show, you may have noticed that the condition of an old book greatly influences its value. This includes the presence and condition of the dust jacket, if the book originally had one.)

Of course, not all books are collectible, at least not when they are new. But even new hardcover books can become collectible later on.

(The aesthetic argument and the information printed on the dust jacket, mentioned in NiceOrc's answer, are also valid, of course.)

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.