Literature Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for scholars and enthusiasts of literature. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
The following line from an old translation of John Chrysostom's Homily 14 on Romans is rather perplexing:
It [creation] was evil intreated for your sake, and became corruptible; yet it has had no wrong done it.
What is meant by "was evil intreated"? I can't find any definitions of "intreat" or "entreat" that would fit here.
Lexico suggests entreat for intreat and has
entreat²
archaic [with object and adverbial] Treat (someone) in a specified manner
‘the King, I fear, hath ill entreated her’
which seems to fit admirably: "Creation was treated evilly."
(Lexico's example sentence is a quote from Christopher Marlowe's Edward the Second, which shows just how archaic it is.)
