In Rabelais' Gargantua, in Chapter 13, we find a discussion on the best means to wipe one's bum.

You can find Urquhart's translation here. I am specifically interested in the conclusion:

But, to conclude, I say and maintain, that of all torcheculs, arsewisps, bumfodders, tail-napkins, bunghole cleansers, and wipe-breeches, there is none in the world comparable to the neck of a goose, that is well downed, if you hold her head betwixt your legs

(emphasis mine)

In Rabelais' original, this is:

Mais, concluent, je dys et mantiens qu’il n’y a tel torchecul que d’un oyzon bien dumeté, pourveu qu’on luy tienne la teste entre les jambes

(emphasis mine -- source)

Which in contemporary French is typically rendered as "oisillon bien duveté" i.e.,:

  • "oisillon" — a baby bird, a fledgling
  • "bien duveté" — fluffy, well downed

Why did Urquhart pick "goose", and even more specifically, "neck of a goose"?

New contributor
Greg Sadetsky is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct.
  • 3
    Welcome to the site, and nice first question!
    – Rand al'Thor

1 Answer 1


It's not a oisillon, it's a oison.

A oison is a gosling, i.e., a baby goose. See Wiktionary. (A oie is a goose; knowing this is what made me look oison up in the dictionary.)

So why did Urquhart pick goose and not gosling? I don't know. It seems like a translation error to me. He did at least get the right species, but I expect a gosling's down feathers are even softer than a goose's.

Why the neck? Presumably because, if you're holding a goose's head between your legs, the neck is the part that is in the appropriate position.

Why do some contemporary French sources translate it from Rabelais' French as a oisillon bien duveté? Maybe that's also a translation error.

  • Thank you very much. oison rather than oisillon makes sense, and the probable explanation regarding neck does as well. I really appreciate it! yesterday
  • For what it's worth, the Russian translation has it as "что нет лучшей подтирки, чем гусенок с нежным пушком" (source) i.e. a gosling (гусенок) with soft (нежным) down/fluff (пушком). 16 hours ago

Your Answer

Greg Sadetsky is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.