I remember reading this as a short story in an anthology, probably in the early 1990s. My parents had a lot of books with crime stories in them, as well as humor anthologies, so that unfortunately doesn't narrow it down much. The protagonist is a somewhat nutty detective who has been assigned (or assigned himself?) to a case involving stolen diamonds. Unfortunately, the only details which are firm in my mind are that a) at one point he triumphantly smashes a vase, claiming that the diamonds were baked into the obvious fake, only to be told that it was a priceless antique vase (Ming?) that was worth more than the lost diamonds and b) that the eventual reveal is that the thieves took a baby's rattle, opened it up, and stuck the diamonds in there. I want to say there was some description of "dirty gray rocks" either from them having found the original beads from the rattle, or as a description of how the diamonds looked when liberated from the rattle.

I do remember there was at least one illustration in the story, showing the detective holding up either the vase or the rattle, with a vacant look on his face. I want to say that he had blond curls, and was dressed as a pastiche of Sherlock Holmes costumes with a deerstalker hat and meerschaum pipe.

I'm certain it's not Cam Jansen and the Mystery of the Stolen Diamonds, which involves a similar reveal.

1 Answer 1


P. Moran Diamond Hunter by Percival Wilde looks like possibility. I found some snippets in the Google Books record of Spellbinders in Suspense By Alfred Hitchcock:

He says, “Moran, do you realize what have you done? You have smashed a sang de beef vase right out of the finest Ming period! The Metropolitan Museum tried to buy that vase from me but I would not sell it, and the leaves of the plant are turned away from the light because it is an artificial plant!”

I can see that the pebbles, which were round and small and about the same size obviously came from the baby's rattle — so obviously that nobody thought of it excepting you — and that Hewitt made the substitution in the dark, taking it for granted we wouldn't give the pebbles a second glance; but there must have been clues which told you who was the guilty man long before that.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.