6

From the prologue of Hard to Be a God:

"You know, Anetchka--" said Pashka.
"Don't you call me Anetchka," Anka cut in abruptly. She could not stand to be called by any other name than Anka.

Now I know about diminutive forms of Russian names, and that different diminutive forms of the same name can be used in different ways (e.g. a man named Ivan might be called Vanya, Vanka, or Vanechka by different people or under different circumstances). But my knowledge of Russian diminutives isn't good enough to understand the nuances of when each different form would be used.

What does it say about Anka's character that she refuses to answer to Anetchka?

(Note to non-Slavic speakers: as I understand it, this is not the same as, say, an Englishman called James who refuses to answer to Jim. Russian diminutive forms are much more prevalent, even being widely used for common nouns as well as personal names, and different diminutives of the same name have specific meanings. I suspect that a fluent Russian speaker could look at this quote and immediately deduce something about Anka's personality - my question is what.)

  • "Аня" (Anya) would probably be a bit more appropriate. They are peers, and "Анечка" (Anetchka) is too patronising when used by a peer. A parent could use it, or anyone who is sufficiently older, but not a peer, and certainly not someone as familiar and cheerful as Pashka. – Gallifreyan Apr 2 '17 at 15:52
  • 1
    When I read that passage, I understood that she wanted no nicknames or diminutives. After all, "She could not stand to be called by any other name than Anka." – Shokhet Apr 2 '17 at 18:13
  • 1
    @Shokhet Anka is itself a diminutive form of Anna. Also, as I understand it (knowing some Russian without being fluent), not wanting to be called by diminutives is much harder to do in Russian, where diminutives for everything are more widespread, and would probably be considered strange/unusual. – Rand al'Thor Apr 2 '17 at 18:14
  • Oh, my bad. I speak no Russian and naively assumed that Anka is a name in it's own right – Shokhet Apr 2 '17 at 18:15
8

All three of them are trying to seem more grown up than they really are.

Running from their boarding school? With crossbows blazing? That doesn't sound like trying to be more grown up than they really are at all. We don't know how old they are at this time, but I'll make an educated guess and say 12-16 years old, the right time when running away towards independence is most craved.

And Pashka was filled with the vague elation he always felt when he and Anton had run away from boarding school and a day of total independence lay ahead—full of undiscovered places, wild strawberries, hot deserted meadows, gray lizards, and ice-cold water from unexpected springs. And as always, he wanted to whoop and leap up high in the air, and he immediately did so, and Anton looked at him, laughing, and Pashka saw that Anton’s eyes expressed complete understanding.
Hard to be a God, Gollancz edition, prologue, page 5.

Do note that they carry loaded and lethal weapons:

Anka gave Pashka back his rifle. “Do you always let loose at each other like that?” she asked enviously. “Of course!” Pashka said in surprise. “What, are we supposed to yell ‘Boom-boom’? ‘Bang-bang’? The game needs an element of risk!”

[...]

He was suddenly seized with the certainty that even if he turned his back to them, the heavy bolt would still sink right into the bridge of Pashka’s nose, between his cheerful green eyes.
Ibid, pages 10 and 11.

These kids mean business.

She is (mentally) the most grown-up of them all.

Then there is also, I think, an old trope in Soviet (and maybe in other1) literature, that in a group of two boys and a girl, the girl is usually the most level-headed person.

Take Anton: he clearly admires her:

She had excellent muscles — Anton enjoyed watching the little hard ball of her biceps roll under her tanned skin.

[...]

It was wonderful walking alone in the forest with her like this, shoulder to shoulder, bare elbows touching, glancing over occasionally to take in how pretty she was, how agile, and how amazingly friendly. How her eyes were big and gray, with black eyelashes.
Ibid, pages 3 and 6, respectively.

Or Pavel: he clearly is the most cheerful and happy-go-lucky person of the three. Before the game of Wilhelm Tell, Anton is unsure, Anka is skeptic, and only Paska enjoys himself almost until the end.

Anton took the red bundle and examined it carefully. He looked at Anka—her eyes were like slits. And Pashka was enjoying himself—he was having fun.

[...]

Pashka was smirking. He was still playing around. Anton bent down and started slowly drawing the bowstrings. “Bless you, my father William!” Pashka called out. “And thank you for everything, no matter what happens.”
Ibid, page 11.

Among those adolescent boys, someone has to be the grownup. This hapens to be Anka. And from her overall tone and posture throughout the prologue, one can see that she acts unimpressed by boys' feats.

I believe Anka being the grownup, and Pashka being the least grownup, is what makes her dismiss Pavel's address as angrily as she did.

Pavel was most likely trying to patronise her by using a diminutive "Anechka", given this is the first time she ever ran away from the boarding school with them. He felt he needed to introduce the newbie to the adventure, but Anka had a different opinion on the subject.

Anechka is a very childish and diminitive name.

Disclaimer: this part reflects my own observations and experiences, and I don't expect everyone to agree.

Well, not necessarily childish - lovers may use it in their conversations, but I don't think it is very common. Of all my friends called Anna, all preferred to be called Anya (Аня). An'ka (Анька) is also possible, but it is even less informal and has to be used for someone who is a very close friend.

Anna sounds too formal - there were two Empresses or Russia with that name (one, two); Anechka, on the other hand, is very patronising. Both of my friends did not (mildly put) prefer to be called Anechka under any circumstances. In Anka's situation, when she was among peers, she definitely would not prefer to be called Anechka, or, even worse, Anyusha (Анюша).

Anka, on the other hand, does not sound patronising, but rather as a nickname that is intended to be used by peers (this isn't something I could possibly rationalise either - the ending -nka is often used to derive new "friendly" names for things, and I always thought upon reading that Anka preferred to be called that because it sounds teenager-ish).

There may have been a behind-the-scenes reason for the name "Anka".
The rest is pure speculation and is only tangential to the question.

This is pure speculation, and a very far stretch, and frankly, more of a historical anecdote, but it appears that an Anka was a major character in the 1934 Soviet film Chapaev, about the eponymous Red Army comander.

In his introduction to Hard to be a God, Ken MacLeod notes that Hard to be a God was intended to be written differently, as "an exciting adventure story in the manener of The Three Musketeers". Authors changed the tone of the novel after Nikita Khrushev's visit to the avant-garde exhibiton, where he heavily criticised the artists, using, among others, swear words. Boris Strugatsky reflected on this in his afterword for Hard to be a God:

We shouldn’t have illusions. We shouldn’t have hopes for a brighter future. We were being governed by goons and enemies of culture. They will never be with us. They will always be against us. They will never let us say what we believe is right, because what they believe is right is something completely different. And if for us communism is a world of freedom and creativity, for them communism is a society where the people immediately and with pleasure perform all the prescriptions of the party and government.

The realization of these simple — although then far from obvious for us — truths was painful, like the realization of any truth, but beneficial at the same time. New ideas appeared and strongly demanded their immediate implementation. The “fun story in the spirit of The Three Musketeers” that we had thought up began to appear in an entirely different light, and I didn’t need long speeches to convince Arkady that they needed to make a substantial ideological adjustment in The Observer. The time of “light things,” the time of “swords and cardinals” seemed to have passed. Or maybe it simply hadn’t come yet. The adventure story had to, was obliged to, become a story about the fate of the intelligentsia, submerged in the twilight of the Middle Ages.
Ibid, afterword, page 244.

I think, just maybe, the name Anka had been added to form a positive connection between the hero of the novel and the symbol of patriotism that Anka of the 1934 film was, to soothe the reaction of censors. According to her Wikipedia entry, Anka was added per the request of Stalin, who named Chapaev his favourite film (ironically enough, so did Vladimir).

But then, this is just my speculation.

"Стреляй Анка, спасай наших!" = "Fire, Anka, save our allies!"
Anka on a grafitti in Kharkiv, Ukraine. Art by V. Vizu, from Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0. The grafitti reads "Fire, Anka, save our allies!"


1: As much as I hate to mention those books here, Harry Potter's Hermione Granger would be Anka to Ron and Harry.

  • Why does Pashka call Anka Anetchka in the first place? I think understanding that would be very helpful in understanding why Anka rebuked Pashka, and understand the context that this scene takes place in. – user111 Apr 2 '17 at 18:33
  • @Hamlet "Pavel was most likely trying to patronise her, given this is the first time she ever came to the forest with them. He felt he needed to introduce the newbie, but Anka had a different opinion." – Gallifreyan Apr 2 '17 at 18:35
  • Oh, sorry. Maybe move that part to the top: that line should be the main point of the answer. – user111 Apr 2 '17 at 18:37
  • 2
    @Hamlet The quote from the question suggests that she doesn't like to be called Anechka at all, not that she took offence at Pashka calling her that on that particular occasion. – Rand al'Thor Apr 2 '17 at 18:39
  • 1
    I was going to post an answer regarding that also possibly being "too familiar" in a romantic connotation sort of way; but I don't think the ages at that moment in the story warrant that interpretation. – DVK Apr 3 '17 at 14:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.