I was just introduced to the sci-fi short story "The Jackson Killer", thanks to this ID answer on another site. It can be read freely online at the Internet Archive. One of the paragraphs near the start of the story runs as follows:

Lassen was handsome in a taughtly aristocratic kind of way, smooth, well groomed and the bleakness in his eyes was only visible in a certain light at a certain angle. A vaguely repellent quality is something an Eliminator acquires and must learn to hide successfully.

What is the meaning of "taughtly aristocratic"? Is it a typo or misprint of "tautly", which seems to me to make more sense in this context?


1 Answer 1


It’s a rare spelling variation. The OED says:

taut, adj. Forms: … β. 1600s– taught (now nonstandard)

and gives citations showing that this form remains current:

1834   F. Marryat Peter Simple II. xi. 174   The yards carefully squared, and the ropes hauled taught.
1948   Trans. & Proc. Amer. Philol. Assoc. 79 48   When the lines were drawn taught the sail was relatively flat.
1997   M. L. Frankel Cruising Gulags 175   Its telephone system..is marginally better than two tomato cans separated by a taught string.

This spelling variation carries over to the adverb, for although the OED does not record the spelling “taughtly”, it is easy to find many examples via Google Books:

1979   M. Langley Nandi of Kenya 43   It is made by drawing a piece of goatskin taughtly over one end of a small wooden barrel
1987   E. C. Apfelstadt Later Sculpture of Antonio Rossellino 161   The cast of characters is the same, with two taughtly drawn shepherds
2012   C. Vaporis Voices of Early Modern Japan 170   The noise was made by a thin shred of bamboo stretched taughtly across the top of the kite and played upon by the wind.

So in context in ‘The Jackson Killer’, “taughtly” means “in a taut manner”, where “taut” can be understood in the sense:

taut, adj. 5.c. Neatly or smartly turned out or presented.

This agrees with the description “smooth, well groomed” in the story.


There was some skepticism in the comments as to whether the evidence presented above really shows that “taught” is a variation and not a mistake. Could every one of the examples listed be an accident?

I think that this kind of criticism is less tenable once you have looked at books that use only the spelling “taught”, and use it multiple times, showing that it was not only the preferred spelling of the author, but also acceptable to the editor and proof-reader too. Here are a couple of examples:

Taught (tight). The string or twine is pulled “taught” when a loop is made
Pull both strings taught taking care that the knot bites and does not slip
when the spoole is removed, draw the needle taught
loosened sufficiently to enable the workman to draw the last loop up taught
now let go the left thumb, pull the knot taught above the knot of the mesh
pulling towards you sufficiently to keep the margins taught
When you fling the twine round, and until you pull the knot taught
make a loop as usual, only just before you draw the twine taught

Charles Bathurst (1837). Notes on Nets; or, the Quincunx Practically Considered. London: J. Van Voorst.

Pull the masking tape fairly taught
This time use the canvas pliers to grip the canvas and pull it taught
Carry out the same process on the fourth side, using the pliers for a good taught finish
Test the tension of the canvas. It should be taught but also give slightly
light tapping of the canvas will pull it taught again

Heather Schofield (1979). Flower Painting Techniques. London: B. T. Batsford.

  • 1
    I'd be more inclined to view it as an error than a variant spelling.
    – nick012000
    Mar 19, 2022 at 5:52
  • A variant spelling would at least be reasonably consistent among the individuals who use it (i.e. they would intentionally use it repeatedly, if not exclusively). Can we conclude that this is not simply an error among people who generally use "taut"?
    – Obie 2.0
    Mar 19, 2022 at 18:01
  • 1
    @Obie2.0 It's easy to find examples of printed texts using the spelling "taught" consistently—showing that it was not only the preferred spelling of the author, but also acceptable to the editor and proof-reader too. Mar 19, 2022 at 18:27
  • @GarethRees - Interesting. Even recently?
    – Obie 2.0
    Mar 19, 2022 at 18:28
  • @Obie2.0 See updated answer. Mar 20, 2022 at 17:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.