The Wikipedia article about Thomas Hardy says that

Hardy divided his novels and collected short stories into three classes:[citation needed]

The statement has no source. Charlotte Barrett's article Character and Environment in Thomas Hardy's Fiction (Great Writers Inspire, 15 May 2012) confirms the statement but does not provide a source either:

Hardy classified his novels into three groups; the biggest section named 'Novels of Character and Environment' includes the works discussed in this essay, plus some of Hardy's other major novels Tess of the d'Urbervilles, The Mayor of Casterbridge, and Far From the Madding Crowd.

Charlotte Barrett's article Thomas Hardy (15 May 2012) on the same site does not repeat the statement. I assume that the statement is based on something in Hardy's non-fiction, much of which was destroyed after his death:

Shortly after Hardy's death, the executors of his estate burnt his letters and notebooks, but twelve notebooks survived, (…)

So what is the source for the statement about the three groups that Hardy distinguished in his work?

1 Answer 1


In the General Preface to the so-called Wessex Edition of his complete works, published in 1912. Said preface is reproduced here and begins as follows (emphasis mine):

In accepting a proposal for a definitive edition of these productions in prose and verse I have found an opportunity of classifying the novels under heads that show approximately the author’s aim, if not his achievement, in each book of the series at the date of its composition. Sometimes the aim was lower than at other times; sometimes, where the intention was primarily high, force of circumstances (among which the chief were the necessities of magazine publication) compelled a modification, great or slight, of the original plan. Of a few, however, of the longer novels, and of many of the shorter tales, it may be assumed that they stand to-day much as they would have stood if no accidents had obstructed the channel between the writer and the public. That many of them, if any, stand as they would stand if written now is not to be supposed[.]

In the classification of these fictitious chronicles—for which the name of ‘The Wessex Novels’ was adopted, and is still retained—the first group is called ‘Novels of Character and Environment,’ and contains those which approach most nearly to uninfluenced works; also one or two which, whatever their quality in some few of their episodes, may claim a verisimilitude in general treatment and detail.

The second group is distinguished as ‘Romances and Fantasies,’ a sufficiently descriptive definition. The third class—‘Novels of Ingenuity’—show a not infrequent disregard of the probable in the chain of events, and depend for their interest mainly on the incidents themselves. They might also be characterized as ‘Experiments,’ and were written for the nonce simply; though despite the artificiality of their fable some of their scenes are not without fidelity to life.

It will not be supposed that these differences are distinctly perceptible in every page of every volume. It was inevitable that blendings and alternations should occur in all. Moreover, as it was not thought desirable in every instance to change the arrangement of the shorter stories to which readers have grown accustomed, certain of these may be found under headings to which an acute judgment might deny appropriateness.

Hat-tip to Linda Joyce Baker whose 1969 master's thesis ""Novels of Character and Environment": a Study of the Works of Thomas Hardy" from Kansas State Teachers College showed me where to look:

Hardy's phrase "Novels of Character and Environment," which he first used in the General Preface to the Wessex Edition (1912) of his novels.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.