In Reginald in Russia, Saki writes:

Reginald sat in a corner of the Princess’s salon and tried to forgive the furniture, which started out with an obvious intention of being Louis Quinze, but relapsed at frequent intervals into Wilhelm II.

How are mentioning the figures Louis Quinze and Wilhelm II significant in relation to the disparate style of furniture in the room?

  • This probably answers half of the question, but I suspect there's some humorous symbolism in the Wilhelm II reference which would be the main answer to this question.
    – Rand al'Thor
    Aug 25, 2020 at 13:31
  • As the reigning Kaiser, Wilhelm II presumably just means "Modern German"
    – mikado
    Aug 26, 2020 at 6:25

1 Answer 1


Louis Quinze and Wilhelm II are relevant to the styles of furniture in the room, though perhaps not in a way some readers might expect. Louis XV's name is connected with one of several styles of furniture developed in France because several French rulers (or those around them, e.g. Louis XV's mistress Madame de Pompadour) were patrons of the arts. It is no coincidence that the eighteenth century is sometimes described as the golden age of French furniture. This patronage led to the creation of styles of furniture that are still collected today.

Wilhelm II, by contrast, who was roughly a contemporary of Saki's, is not remembered as a patron of the arts but for his militarism and belligerent foreign policy. That does not mean that no great style of furniture was developed in the German-speaking part of Europe; Jugendstil also had its influence on furniture style, but has nothing to do with the Kaiser. When Reginald mentions Wilhelm II, he is definitely not thinking of Jugendstil. (Speaking more generally, German pre-twentieth-century furniture has never been as attractive as French furniture. Jugendstil, which started in the 1890s, is not mainly remembered for its furniture.)

With this in mind, Reginald's comment about the furniture means that the Princess tried to furnish the salon with stylish (and presumably collectible and expensive) French furniture but also had to compromise and settle from some contemporary, totally unremarkable and cheaper pieces of furniture.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.