Abrahamic eschatology promises a golden age for humanity, an unending time of universal peace and prosperity.

The idea of an eternally peaceful and prosperous society united in a common cause seems central to the utopian genre, so can the Abrahamic religious texts describing such a promised paradise (Ezekiel, Ezra, Baruch, Zechariah, Isaiah, Revelation, az-Zalzalah, al-Baqarah, etc) be considered utopian? Is there sufficient distinction between the eschatologies of the Abrahamic tradition that some are utopian while others are not?

closed as primarily opinion-based by EJoshuaS - Reinstate Monica, VicAche, fi12, Beastly Gerbil, Matrim Cauthon Apr 23 '17 at 15:03

Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • What texts are you referring to, and what particular viewpoint? Answers are likely to be highly opinionated. – Mick Feb 5 '17 at 9:11
  • 2
    I'm not sure what you mean by "viewpoint." Since this is lit.se, the central texts of each faith should be expected to stand on their own separate from the disparate interpretations of various groups and sects. I certainly hope answers are highly opinionated; the success of lit.se as a legit centre for analysis rests on our ability to support opinions well enough to pass muster. – BESW Feb 5 '17 at 9:41
  • The opinionation that's problematic isn't the interpretation of text - it's the interpretation what what does it mean to be "utopian". You should probably offer some sort of firm definition of what you mean by "utopian" genre for this to be answerable. If you go by the broadest definition of the genre, they all generally apply by definition (the reflection the author's desired, preferred, social end state); with the only boring nitpick that some of them don't have any concept of "social/political" structures at all, at which point it's again just definition quibbling. – DVK Feb 5 '17 at 18:49
  • @DVK I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that would turn this into an XY problem where I pre-decide what kind of solution I want and just ask for support of that solution, instead of presenting the problem in a way which lets experts approach it in whatever way is best. What you're describing is more of a "homework" question. – BESW Feb 5 '17 at 21:08

First, consider the fact that many of the texts you mention include significant apocalyptic elements, too. In fact, imminent judgment is a major theme in the majority of the works you describe.

From Isaiah 6:8-13:

And I heard the voice of the Lord saying, “Whom shall I send, and who will go for us?” Then I said, “Here I am! Send me.” 9And he said, “Go, and say to this people:
“‘Keep on hearing, but do not understand;
keep on seeing, but do not perceive.’
10Make the heart of this people dull,
and their ears heavy,
and blind their eyes;
lest they see with their eyes,
and hear with their ears,
and understand with their hearts,
and turn and be healed.”
11Then I said, “How long, O Lord?”
And he said:
“Until cities lie waste
without inhabitant,
and houses without people,
and the land is a desolate waste,
12and the Lord removes people far away,
and the forsaken places are many in the midst of the land.
13And though a tenth remain in it,
it will be burned again,
like a terebinth or an oak,
whose stump remains
when it is felled.”
The holy seed is its stump.

Obviously, that's quite different than what you'd normally expect from a work intend primarily as a utopian work.

As for whether the "golden age for humanity" is utopian, I suppose that depends somewhat on your view of the text and your definition of utopian work. Some of this depends, too, on your view of the relationship between authorial intent and meaning, so feel free to disagree with me on this point, but I think that there's a real sense in which the author has to actually intend a utopian (or dystopian) work to be that. For example, books like 1984, The Hunger Games and Atlas Shrugged are clearly dystopian fiction, but in all three cases the authors were consciously writing dystopian fiction for the purpose of engaging in social commentary. They are also, in some sense, counterfactual: Suzanne Collins doesn't literally think that the government's going to start running annual Hunger Games, but that's not really the point. You can say the same for utopian fiction, actually. I really don't think that that's what's going on with the texts you mention, though; while they certainly make heavy use of hyperbole and metaphor, I don't think that the authors were really intending the texts to be completely counterfactual in the way that you'd usually see with utopian or dystopian fiction.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.